Seminars in Pediatric Surgery
Volume 21, Issue 1 , Pages 2-14, February 2012

Neuroblastoma

  • Andrew M. Davidoff, MD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests and correspondence: Andrew M. Davidoff, MD, Department of Surgery, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN 38105-3678

Department of Surgery, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee

Article Outline

Neuroblastoma is a heterogeneous disease; tumors can spontaneously regress or mature, or display an aggressive, therapy-resistant phenotype. Increasing evidence indicates that the biological and molecular features of neuroblastoma significantly influence and are highly predictive of clinical behavior. Because of this, neuroblastoma has served as a paradigm for biological risk assessment and treatment assignment. Most current clinical studies of neuroblastoma base therapy and its intensity on a risk stratification that takes into account both clinical and biological variables predictive of relapse. For example, surgery alone offers definitive therapy with excellent outcome for patients with low-risk disease, whereas patients at high risk for disease relapse are treated with intensive multimodality therapy. In this review recent advances in the understanding of the molecular genetic events involved in neuroblastoma pathogenesis are discussed, and how they are impacting the current risk stratification and providing potential targets for new therapeutic approaches for children with neuroblastoma. In addition, the results of significant recent clinical trials for the treatment of neuroblastoma are reviewed.

Keywords:  Neuroblastoma , Neuroblastic tumors , Risk factors , Immunotherapy , Targeted therapy

 

Neuroblastoma is an embryonal tumor of the sympathetic nervous system, arising during fetal or early postnatal life from sympathetic cells derived from the neural crest. It is the most common solid extracranial malignancy of childhood and the most common malignant tumor in infants.1 The overall incidence of neuroblastoma is 1 case per 100,000 children in the United States, or approximately 700 newly diagnosed patients per year. Neuroblastoma represents approximately 8% of all malignancies diagnosed in pediatric patients younger than 15 years of age but is responsible for a disproportionate percentage of pediatric cancer deaths, approximately 15%.2

However, neuroblastoma is an extremely heterogeneous disease3; tumors can spontaneously regress or mature, even without therapy, or display a very aggressive, malignant phenotype that is poorly responsive to current intensive, multimodal therapy. A number of the factors responsible for this heterogeneity have been identified, and increasing evidence indicates that the biological and molecular features of neuroblastoma are highly predictive of clinical behavior. The assessment of biological risk can, therefore, be used for treatment assignment and stratification, whereby those at high risk for disease relapse are given intensive multimodal therapy, in an attempt to affect a cure. Those at low risk for relapse can have treatment intensity diminished in an attempt to avoid therapy-associated toxicity, while still achieving a very high rate of cure. The predictive value of these biological factors is important not only for the oncologist when considering appropriate chemotherapy, but also for the surgeon when considering the timing and extent of an operative procedure for a child with neuroblastoma.

Back to Article Outline

Risk and treatment stratification 

Prognostic variables 

The most important clinical variables for children with neuroblastoma appear to be age4 and stage5 at diagnosis. Among the most powerful biological factors are MYCN status,6, 7 histopathologic classification,8 and DNA content (ploidy).9, 10 These variables contribute to the Children's Oncology Group (COG) risk stratification and therapeutic approach. However, these factors are being refined and augmented by analyses performed by the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Task Force. The INRG Task Force, which initially convened in 2004, is composed of investigators from the major pediatric cancer cooperative groups throughout the world. The main objective of this Task Force was to develop a consensus approach to pretreatment risk stratification of children with neuroblastoma.

Stage 

International criteria for a common neuroblastoma staging system were first described in 1988 and subsequently revised in 1993.11 The International Neuroblastoma Staging System (INSS) is a surgicopathologic staging system that depends on the completeness of resection of the primary tumor, assessment of ipsilateral and contralateral lymph nodes and the relation of a primary tumor to the midline (Table 1). Although INSS has been shown to have prognostic relevance, there have been some difficulties with its widespread use. The expertise and aggressiveness of the surgeon influence tumor stage, lymph node sampling is done erratically, and patients who are simply observed without surgery cannot be appropriately staged.

Table 1. International Neuroblastoma Staging System
1Localized tumor with complete gross excision, with or without microscopic residual disease; representative ipsilateral lymph nodes negative for tumor microscopically (nodes attached to and removed with primary tumor may be positive).
2ALocalized tumor with incomplete gross excision; representative ipsilateral nonadherent lymph nodes negative for tumor microscopically.
2BLocalized tumor with or without complete gross excision, with ipsilateral nonadherent lymph nodes positive for tumor. Enlarged contralateral lymph nodes must be negative microscopically.
3Unresectable unilateral tumor infiltrating across the midline,⁎ with or without regional lymph node involvement; or localized unilateral tumor with contralateral regional lymph node involvement; or midline tumor with bilateral extension by infiltration (unresectable) or by lymph node involvement
4Any primary tumor with dissemination to distant lymph nodes, bone marrow, bone, liver, skin and/or other organs (except as defined for stage 4[S])
4SLocalized primary tumor (as defined for stage 1 and 2[A], or 2[B]), with dissemination limited to skin, liver and/or bone marrow† (limited to infants <1 year of age).

Adapted from Brodeur et al.11

The MIBG scan (if performed) should be negative in the marrow.

⁎ The midline is defined as the vertebral column. Tumors originating on one side and crossing the midline must infiltrate to or beyond the opposite side of the vertebral column.

† Marrow involvement in stage 4(S) should be minimal, that is, <10% of total nucleated cells identified as malignant on bone marrow biopsy or on marrow aspirate. More extensive marrow involvement would be considered stage

Therefore, a uniform, pretreatment staging system that could be used easily throughout the world, and subject to real-time central review, was sought. Montclair et al, on behalf of the INRG, proposed a new staging system in 2009 based on tumor imaging rather than the extent of surgical resection.12 In this staging system, localized tumors are staged based on the absence (L1) or presence (L2) of one or more of 20 image-defined risk factors. Metastatic tumors are defined as stage M. Stage MS, similar to INSS stage 4(S), refers to disease with metastases limited to skin, liver, and bone marrow (<10% involvement) in children younger than 18 months of age at diagnosis (the INSS 4S age cutoff is 12 months). These young patients can have L1 or L2 primary tumors. The image-defined risk factors are listed in Table 2 and generally reflect encasement of vital structures, primarily vessels and nerves, as determined by diagnostic imaging studies. The absence of these factors had previously been shown to be associated with safe, complete tumor resection.13

Table 2. Objective surgical risk factors for primary resection of localized neuroblastoma
Neck
1. Tumor encasing major vessel(s) (eg, carotid artery, vertebral artery, internal jugular vein)
2. Tumor extending to base of skull
3. Tumor compressing the trachea
4. Tumor encasing the brachial plexus
Thorax
1. Tumor encasing major vessel(s) (eg,subclavian vessels, aorta, superior vena cava)
2. Tumor compressing the trachea or principal bronchi
3. Lower mediastinal tumor, infiltrating the costo-vertebral junction between T9 and T12(may involve the artery of Adamkiewicz perfusing the lower spinal cord)
Abdomen
1. Tumor infiltrating the porta hepatis and/or the hepatoduodenal ligament
2. Tumor encasing the origin of the celiac axis, and/or the superior mesenteric artery
3. Tumor invading one or both renal pedicles
4. Tumor encasing the aorta and/or vena cava
5. Tumor encasing the iliac vessels
6. Pelvic tumor crossing the sciatic notch

In a review of 661 patients in the INRG database, Montclair et al. found that INRG staging had prognostic significance; patients with stage L1 disease had a significantly greater 5-year event-free survival than those with stage L2 disease (90% ± 3% vs 78% ± 4%, P = 0.001). Although INSS is currently still the staging system used for COG patients, the INRG stage assignment is being collected prospectively on all patients for subsequent evaluation.

Age 

Patient age at the time of diagnosis is another clinical variable with independent prognostic value. For all stages of disease beyond stage 1 localized tumors, patients younger than 1 year of age have had significantly better disease-free survival rates than older children with equivalent stages of disease.4 Subsequent data from London et al. on behalf of the COG suggest that the prognostic contribution of age to outcome in patients with neuroblastoma is continuous in nature. Within clinically relevant risk stratification, they found that statistical support exists for an age cutoff of 460 days. More recent data from Moroz et al14 on behalf of the INRG suggest that an age-at-diagnosis cutoff of greater than 18 months is associated with greater risk of disease recurrence. Current COG neuroblastoma protocols have lowered the risk classification from high to intermediate and, therefore, intensity of therapy, for patients 12-18 months of age with stage 3 disease in which the tumor has unfavorable histology, as long as it is not MYCN amplified, and stage 4 disease when the tumor has all favorable biological characteristics (see Table 3).

Table 3. Children's Oncology Group risk stratification for children with neuroblastoma
Risk stratificationINSS stageAgeBiology
Low
Group 1
1AnyAny
2A/2B (>50% resected)AnyMYCN-NA, any histology/ploidy
4S<365 daysMYCN-NA, FH, DI>1
Intermediate
Group 2
2A/2B (<50% resected or Bx only)0-12 yearsMYCN-NA, any histology/ploidy⁎
3<365 daysMYCN-NA, FH, DI>1⁎
3>365 days - 12 yearsMYCN-NA, FH⁎
4S (symptomatic)<365 daysMYCN-NA, FH, DI>1⁎
Group 3
3<365 daysMYCN-NA, either UH or DI=1⁎
4<365 daysMYCN-NA, FH, DI>1⁎
4S<365 daysMYCN-NA, either UH or DI=1⁎; or unknown biology
Group 4
4<365 daysMYCN-NA, either DI=1 or UH
3365 -<547 daysMYCN-NA, UH, any ploidy
4365 -<547 daysMYCN-NA, FH, DI>1
High
2A/2B, 3, 4, 4SAnyMYCN-amplified, any histology/ploidy
3> 547 daysMYCN-NA, UH, any ploidy
4365 - >547 daysMYCN-NA, UH or DI=1
4> 547 daysAny

DI, DNA index; FH, favorable histology; MYCN-NA, MYCN not amplified; UH, unfavorable histology.

⁎ If tumor contains chromosomal 1p LOH or unb11qLOH, or if data are missing, treatment assignment is upgraded to next group.

Histopathology 

In 1984, Shimada and colleagues15 developed an age-linked classification system of neuroblastic tumors on the basis of tumor morphology. This was redefined by the International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification (INPC), which was established in 199916 and revised in 2003.17 Neuroblastic tumors were divided into 4 histologic subtypes on the basis of the degree of surrounding Schwannian stroma: neuroblastoma (Schwannian stroma-poor), ganglioneuroblastoma-intermixed (Schwannian stroma-rich), ganglioneuroblastoma-nodular (composite, Schwannian stroma-rich/stroma-dominant and stroma-poor), and ganglioneuroma (Schwannian stroma-dominant). These tumors are assigned to 1 of 2 prognostic subgroups, favorable and unfavorable, on the basis of histologic characteristics, including the degree of neuroblast differentiation; the nuclear morphology of neuroblastic cells (mitosis-karyorrhexis index [MKI]); and the patient's age.18 Ganglioneuroblastoma-nodular tumors are classified on the basis of the characteristics of the usually grossly apparent nodules (in addition, MYCN determination should be performed specifically on the nodule); ganglioneuroblastoma-intermixed and ganglioneuroma are always of favorable histology. In fact, ganglioneuroma is considered a benign neuroblastic tumor. Despite this, ganglioneuromas can be quite large and infiltrative, and attempts at removal associated with significant complications. In addition, survival does not seem to be influenced by extent of resection.19 Therefore, aggressive attempts at surgical resection are not recommended.

The INPC classification system became widely accepted and has proven to be useful as an independent predictor of disease outcome. The importance of this histopathologic classification was confirmed in a large, retrospective analysis reported by Shimada et al.8 Analysis of the prognostic importance of histopathology has been confounded by the inclusion of age, itself an independent prognostic factor, in the classification. Therefore, in the INRG classification schema tumor differentiation and MKI are separated for risk stratification (see below).

Molecular abnormalities 

Amplification of the MYCN proto-oncogene 

Early studies of neuroblastoma showed the frequent presence of extrachromosomal double-minute chromatin bodies and chromosomally integrated homogeneously staining regions characteristic of gene amplification.20 Since then, it has been shown that the amplified region was derived from the distal short arm of chromosome 2 (2p24) and contained the MYCN proto-oncogene. Overall, approximately 25% of primary neuroblastomas have MYCN amplification; MYCN amplification is present in 40% of patients with advanced disease and 5% to 10% of patients with low-stage disease.6 Amplification of MYCN, defined as greater than 10 copies of the gene per cell, is associated with advanced stages of disease, rapid tumor progression, and poor outcome; therefore, it is a powerful prognostic indicator of biologically aggressive tumor behavior and has remained so since its identification in 1983.6, 7

DNA content (ploidy) 

Normal human cells contain 2 copies of each of 23 chromosomes; thus, a normal diploid cell has 46 chromosomes. The majority (55%) of primary neuroblastomas are triploid or “near-triploid,” containing between 58 and 80 chromosomes; the remainder (45%) are either “near-diploid” (35-57 chromosomes) or “near-tetraploid” (81-103 chromosomes).21 The DNA index is the ratio of the number of chromosomes to the expected number (ie, 46). Therefore, diploid cells have a DNA index of 1.0, whereas near-triploid cells have a DNA index ranging from 1.26 to 1.76. Patients with near-triploid (also termed “hyperdiploid”) tumors typically have favorable clinical and biological prognostic factors and excellent survival rates, compared with those patients who have near-diploid or near-tetraploid tumors.10 This association was initially felt to be most important for infants with advanced disease.22 Currently, ploidy only potentially impacts the risk group assessment of infants age 12-18 months with metastatic disease and infants with 4S disease in the COG risk stratification schema (see Table 3).

Allelic deletions on chromosomes 1p and 11q 

Deletions of genetic material in tumors suggest the presence (and subsequent loss) of a tumor suppressor gene. Early karyotype analyses of neuroblastoma-derived cell lines showed frequent deletions of the short arm of chromosome 1 (1p).23 1p deletions, as determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization, are now thought to occur in approximately 30% of neuroblastomas with the smallest common region of loss located within region 1p36.24 Approximately 70% of advanced-stage neuroblastomas have 1p deletions,25 an occurrence that correlates with both MYCN amplification and other high-risk features.24 A recent study has demonstrated that 1p deletions are independently associated with a worse outcome in patients with neuroblastoma.26 Although no individual tumor suppressor gene has been confirmed on chromosome 1p, recent data have identified CHD5 as the strongest candidate tumor suppressor gene that is deleted from 1p36.31 in neuroblastoma.27

Deletion of the long arm of chromosome 11 (11q) also appears to be common in neuroblastoma, being present in approximately 40% of cases. Unbalanced deletion of 11q (loss with either retention or gain of 11p material) is inversely related to MYCN amplification26, 28 yet is strongly associated with other high-risk features. Recently, Attiyeh et al,26 on behalf of the COG, showed in a large cohort of patients that unbalanced deletion of 11q and 1p36 were independently associated with a worse outcome in patients with neuroblastoma. Therefore, the duration of treatment for children with intermediate risk neuroblastoma on the current COG study is based, in part, on the 1p and 11q allelic status of the tumor.

Current COG risk stratification 

On the basis of these clinical and biological prognostic variables, infants and children with neuroblastoma are categorized into 3 risk groups predictive of relapse; low, intermediate, and high-risk (Table 3). The probability of prolonged disease-free survival for patients in each group is 95% to 100%, 85% to 90%, and less than 30%.

Low-risk disease 

 
Characteristics 

This classification includes all patients with stage 1 disease or patients with stage 2A/2B disease that is not MYCN-amplified and where the tumor has undergone a greater than 50% resection. Also included in the low-risk group are infants with stage 4(S) disease that is of favorable histology, without MYCN amplification, and has a DNA index greater than 1.

Results 

A group-wide study (COG P9641: Primary Surgical Therapy for Biologically Defined Low-Risk Neuroblastoma) was conducted from 1998 to 2006 to evaluate primary surgical therapy for biologically defined low-risk neuroblastoma. The overall strategy was to treat patients with low-risk neuroblastoma with surgery and supportive care only; adjuvant therapy was given only when less than 50% of the tumor was resected or when symptoms that were life- or organ-threatening developed. A probability of 3-year survival more than 95% was predicted for these patients with low-risk disease. The final results from this study have yet to be published, but it appears likely that greater than 50% resection of low-risk, INSS stage 2 A/B tumors in asymptomatic patients is sufficient therapy; adjuvant chemotherapy can be reserved for patients with disease progression or recurrence.

Current treatment 

The treatment for patients with low-risk disease remains surgical resection alone, even in the presence of microscopic residual disease (stage 1), gross residual disease (stage 2[A]), or gross residual disease with ipsilateral lymph node involvement (stage 2[B]), if the tumor does not have MYCN amplification. Infants with stage 4(S) disease who are not experiencing substantial symptoms may undergo an initial biopsy and observation only, if the tumor has favorable biological factors. It is also likely that close biochemical and sonographic observation alone can be used for the management of infants with small adrenal masses, with surgical resection being reserved for those rare cases in which there is evidence of continued growth. This hypothesis has been tested in the recently closed COG trial, ANBLOOP2: Perinatal Neuroblastoma: Expectant Observation. To be eligible, infants with an adrenal mass had to be <6 months of age when the mass was first identified; the mass had to be <16 ml in volume, if solid, or <65 ml if at least 25% cystic; and disease must have been limited to the adrenal gland. The results of this study should be available soon.

Intermediate-risk disease 
Characteristics 

This classification includes patients ages 0-12 years with stage 2A/2B disease that is not MYCN-amplified and where the tumor has undergone less than 50% resection (or biopsy only), patients age 0-1.5 years with stage 3 disease whose tumors are not MYCN-amplified, patients age 1.5-12 years with stage 3 disease whose tumors are not MYCN-amplified and are of favorable histology, infants with stage 4 disease whose tumors are not MYCN-amplified, and patients age 1-1.5 years with stage 4 disease whose tumors are not MYCN-amplified, have favorable histology and DNA index (DI) > 1. Also included in this group are infants with 4S disease who are symptomatic from their tumor and the tumor biological characteristics are either of unfavorable histology or DI = 1, or if no tissue was obtained at presentation for evaluation.

Results 

A group-wide study (COG A3961: Treatment for Infants and Children with Intermediate-Risk Neuroblastoma) was conducted from 1998 to 2006 to further refine therapy for patients with intermediate-risk disease. The overriding aim of this study was to maintain or improve survival while minimizing both acute and long-term morbidity in this group of patients. Patients received 4 of the most active agents in neuroblastoma: cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, carboplatin, and etoposide, given for either 4 cycles (favorable biology) or 8 cycles (unfavorable biology); cycles were given every 3 weeks. Radiation therapy was not given unless there was progressive disease or an unresectable primary tumor with unfavorable prognostic features at the end of chemotherapy. The outcome after reduced chemotherapy for intermediate-risk neuroblastoma was published recently by Baker, et al., on behalf of the COG.29 The 3-year overall survival for the entire group was 96%; survival was 98% for those with favorable biological features and 93% for those with unfavorable features.29

Current treatment 

The current COG protocol (ANBL0531: Response- and Biology-based Therapy for Intermediate-risk Neuroblastoma), which opened in October 2007, was recently closed to accrual. This protocol sought to further refine the minimal therapy needed to achieve the excellent outcomes for patients with intermediate-risk neuroblastoma. As such, many patients, as defined by favorable clinical and biological factors, received a further reduction in therapy. However, those patients in whom there is loss of heterozygosity (LOH—loss of 1 of 2 normally paired chromosomal regions) at chromosome 1p or 11q (unbalanced) were not eligible for this dose reduction, as these events have been shown to be independently associated with decreased progression-free survival in patients with low- and intermediate-risk disease.26 Patients again received cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, carboplatin, and etoposide given every 3 weeks. The duration of therapy (ie, the number of cycles), depended upon which of 3 intermediate-risk groups a patient was placed in, with group stratification again being based on clinical and biological risk factors (Table 3). For almost all intermediate-risk patients, regardless of group (except group 4, stage 4 infants), this represented a reduction in therapy, either shortening the duration (groups 2 and 3), or downgrading from high-risk therapy (group 4). However, as previously mentioned, patients in groups 2 or 3 whose tumor contains chromosomal 1p LOH or unbalanced 11q LOH (or if the data were missing) were upgraded one group (ie, received double the number of chemotherapy cycles, just as they would have on the prior intermediate-risk COG trial A3961).

The overall surgical goal in intermediate-risk patients is to perform the most complete tumor resection possible, consistent with preservation of full organ and neurologic function. This may necessitate leaving residual disease adherent to critical anatomic structures. If a primary tumor is judged by the surgeon to be unresectable, a diagnostic biopsy is generally obtained and chemotherapy initiated. Delayed surgery is performed after the prescribed number of cycles, as dictated by the Group assignment. A reduction in surgical therapy is being evaluated for infants with 4S disease as it is no longer required that they undergo resection of their primary tumor. In addition, if they are too unstable at presentation, it is no longer required that they undergo an initial biopsy to be eligible for enrollment on ANBL0531.

Radiation was administered only to symptomatic intermediate-risk patients when there was a risk of organ impairment because of tumor bulk not responding to initial chemotherapy, particularly in infants with 4S disease and respiratory insufficiency and patients with epidural disease and symptoms of spinal cord compression.

High-risk disease 
Characteristics 

This classification includes all patients older than 1.5 years with stage 4 disease, patients of any age and any stage (except stage 1) with MYCN amplified tumors, patients older than 1.5 years with stage 3 tumors that have unfavorable histology, and patients 1-1.5 years of age with stage 4 disease that has either unfavorable histology or DI = 1.

Results 

The general approach to treating patients with high-risk neuroblastoma has included intensive induction chemotherapy, myeloablative consolidation therapy with stem cell rescue, and targeted therapy for minimal residual disease. Stem cell harvest is typically performed after the first 2 cycles of induction therapy, and resection of the primary tumor and bulky metastatic sites is attempted after the fifth cycle. The CCG-3891 protocol enrolled patients with high-risk neuroblastoma between 1991 and 1996 and was designed to assess whether myeloablative therapy in conjunction with autologous bone marrow transplantation (BMT) improved event-free survival (EFS), compared with chemotherapy alone, and whether subsequent treatment with 13-cis-retinoic acid, a differentiating agent, would further improve EFS.30 The results from this double-randomization study demonstrated that the 3-year EFS was significantly better in patients who underwent BMT during the first randomization (34%) than in those who did not (22%; P = 0.034); in the second randomization, those who received 13-cis-retinoic acid after BMT experienced a significantly better 3-year EFS (46%) than those who did not receive the retinoid (29%, P = 0.027). Unfortunately, the long-term survival advantage for these patients is becoming less apparent. Nevertheless, autologous stem cell transplantation and 13-cis-retinoic acid are now part of most current high-risk neuroblastoma protocols.

The first cooperative group high-risk neuroblastoma protocol (A3973: A Randomized Study of Purged vs unpurged peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant Following Dose Intensive Induction Therapy for High-Risk Neuroblastoma) opened in February 2001. Eligible patients were randomized to receive either unpurged or purged autologous stem cells. The rationale for this randomization was that although there has been some evidence that tumor cells contaminating reinfused autologous stem cells contribute to tumor relapse in patients with neuroblastoma, it is uncertain whether the removal of the tumor cells by purging the stem cell product would influence relapse rates.31, 32 This protocol was closed to accrual early (March 2006); however, because an interim analysis showed no difference in outcome for children who received either purged or unpurged stem cell product.

Current therapy 

The current COG high-risk neuroblastoma protocol, ANB0532: phase III Randomized Trial of Single vs Tandem myeloablative as Consolidation Therapy for High-Risk Neuroblastoma, which opened in November 2007, has as its primary goal to test whether further intensification of myeloablative therapy will improve the cure rate. Randomization to either one myeloablative consolidation with a carboplatin/etoposide/melphalan preparative regimen or 2 myeloablative consolidations, in which the initial regimen includes thiotepa and cyclophosphamide, will occur at the completion of induction chemotherapy.

Another primary aim of this study is to determine whether additional radiation therapy delivered to gross residual disease improves local control. Four to six weeks after stem cell transplantation, radiation therapy is administered to the region of the primary tumor site, including involved adjacent lymph nodes. The target volume is the area of residual disease, which is determined radiographically, after induction chemotherapy but prior to delayed surgical resection, with an additional 1.5-cm margin added, even if a complete resection was ultimately achieved. Patients whose primary site has achieved a complete response at the end of induction therapy, will receive 21.6 Gy to the site of primary locoregional disease while areas with gross residual disease will be treated with an additional boost of 14.4 Gy (36-Gy total). Sites of persistent active metastatic disease prior to stem cell transplantation (ie, positive sites on metaiodobenzylguanidine [MIBG] scanning or those that do not show diminished enhancement on serial bone scans) are irradiated at the same time and with the same dose as the primary site.

The role of surgery in the management of children with high-risk neuroblastoma is controversial. Several reports have suggested that patients with INSS stage 3 or 4 disease who undergo gross total resection of their primary tumor and locoregional disease experience improved local tumor control and increased overall survival33, 34; however, other reports have had different conclusions.35, 36 The role of debulking is also unclear. However, resection of as much gross tumor as possible in patients who receive a stem cell transplant in combination with high-dose chemotherapy and total body irradiation may be of some benefit.37 Despite the uncertainty of the role of surgery, the COG high-risk protocol currently recommends attempting gross total resection of the primary tumor and locoregional disease in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma. Most children undergo delayed surgery after the completion of the fifth cycle of induction chemotherapy, even though tumor volume reduction plateaus after the second or third cycle of chemotherapy.38 Other groups are performing surgery as soon as locoregional disease appears, radiographically, to be resectable.39 Although initial surgical resection is not often appropriate for patients with neuroblastoma, the principle of resection at the earliest feasible time should be considered.

Secondary surgical objectives embedded in the current COG high-risk protocol include (1) to determine whether resection completeness is predictive of local control rate or event-free survival; (2) to prospectively describe the complications related to efforts at local control; and (3) to describe the neurologic outcomes in patients with paraspinal primary tumors.

Proposed INRG risk stratification 

As mentioned previously, in an effort to establish an international consensus on pretreatment risk stratification, the INRG Task Force developed the INRG Classification System based on an analysis of 8800 patients treated for neuroblastoma between 1990 and 2002. They used survival tree regression analyses with EFS as the primary end point to test the prognostic significance of 13 potentially prognostic factors.40 The analyses determined that 7 of these prognostic variables (INRG stage, age [younger/older than 18 months], histology, tumor differentiation, MYCN status, 11q status, and ploidy) could define 16 different pretreatment risk groups (Table 4). These groups could then be divided into 4 risk categories on the basis of expected 5-year EFS: very low (>85% EFS, 28.2% of patients), low (>75% to ≤85% EFS, 26.8% of patients), intermediate (≥50%–75% EFS, 9.0% of patients) and high (<50% EFS, 36.1% of patients) risk.40 These factors are being prospectively collected on all neuroblastoma patients with the hope that these homogenous cohorts will facilitate future comparisons of risk-based trials performed throughout the world.

Table 4. International Neuroblastoma Risk Group pretreatment classification
INRG StageAge, monthsHistologic categoryGrade of tumor differentiationMYCN11q AberrationPloidyPretreatment risk group
L1/L2 GN maturing; GNB intermixed A Very low
L1 Any, except NA B Very low
L1 GN maturing or GNB intermixed Amp K High
L2<18Any, except No D Low
GN maturing or GNB intermixed NAYes G Intermediate
≥18GNB nodular; neuroblastomaDifferentiatingNANoE Low
Yes
Poorly differentiated or undifferentiatedNA H Intermediate
Amp N High
M<18 NA HyperdiploidF Low
<12 NA DiploidI Intermediate
12 to <18 NA DiploidJ Intermediate
<18 Amp O High
≥18 P High
MS<18 NANoC Very low
Yes Q High
R High

Adapted from Cohn et al.40

GN, ganglioneuroma; GNB, ganglioneuroblastoma.

Please define GNB + GN in the abbreviations footnote.

New treatment strategies 

Immunotherapy 

Neuroblastoma cells are sensitive to antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, as well as to complement-dependent cytotoxicity.41 Targeted immunotherapy via the use of antiganglioside antibodies targeting GD2, the predominant antigen in neuroblastoma cells, appears to be a promising approach for the treatment of advanced neuroblastomas. In a phase II trial, the mouse monoclonal anti-GD2 antibody 3F8 induced a tumor response in 40% of patients with neuroblastoma resistant to chemotherapy.42 To decrease the immunogenicity of murine antibodies, a chimeric antibody was constructed by combining the variable regions of murine IgG3 antiganglioside GD2 antibody 14.18 and the constant regions of human IgG1-κ.

Because the induction of antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity with antiganglioside GD2 antibodies is enhanced by cytokines, such as granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor43 and interleukin-2,44 a phase III trial, COG ANBLOO32, was conducted to determine whether treatment with ch14.18 and cytokines (granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and interleukin-2) together with 13-cis-retinoic acid improves EFS and overall survival after autologous BMT, as compared with treatment with 13-cis-retinoic acid alone in patients with high risk neuroblastoma. The study was stopped early because of demonstrated efficacy; immunotherapy was superior to standard therapy (2-year EFS: 66% vs 46%, P = 0.01 and 2-year overall survival: 86% vs 75%, P = 0.02).45

MIBG therapy 

Refractory neuroblastoma has been treated with 131I-MIBG because it is readily taken-up by the tumor cells.46 In an investigation of patients with advanced chemoresistant neuroblastomas, response rates approached 33%.47 Studies further suggest that this treatment can be used as front-line therapy, followed by chemotherapy, without significant hematologic toxicity.48 125I-MIBG may be an even better treatment option for neuroblastomas with micrometastases or bone marrow infiltration49 and is being tested for the treatment of patients with “ultra high-risk” neuroblastoma (expected survival of less than 15%). A recent study found that although the overall treatment response rate (46%) was high for all patients, older patient with neuroblastoma had a significantly higher treatment response rate and exhibited a trend toward longer post-treatment overall survival, indicating that 131I-MIBG might be an effective salvage agent for neuroblastoma in this difficult to treat patient population.50 A randomization to receive therapeutic MIBG may be included in the next COG phase III high-risk neuroblastoma protocol.

Differentiating agents 

Retinoids, vitamin A derivatives, induce morphologic differentiation of neuroblastoma.51, 52, 53, 54cis-retinoic acid (isotretinoin) is a synthetic derivative of the naturally occurring all-trans retinoic acid. As mentioned previously, the 3-year EFS of patients who received 13-cis-retinoic acid (46%) as maintenance therapy on CCG 3891 was significantly greater than that of patients who received no further therapy (29%; P = 0.027) and was independent of the initial randomization to either chemotherapy or autologous BMT.30 Because of this result, all patients on the current COG high-risk protocol receive oral 13-cis-retinoic acid twice daily for 2 weeks followed by 2 weeks without; this treatment is continued for 6 cycles (6 months total). Group 4 patients, age 12-18 months, being treated on the current COG intermediate-risk protocol, also receive 13-cis-retinoic acid. Another synthetic retinoid, fenretinide (4-HPR) is currently being tested for the use in maintenance therapy for high-risk neuroblastoma. Unlike 13-cis-RA, fenretinide does not cause phenotypic changes, but produces tumor cell apoptosis and appears to be effective against cell lines that are resistant to RA.55 A recent COG phase I study was able to achieve systemic levels of fenretinide in patients that were active against neuroblastoma in vitro with minimal toxicity.56

Angiogenesis inhibition 

Angiogenesis is the biological process of blood vessel formation. In addition to occurring as part of several normal, physiological processes, angiogenesis is an essential component of several pathologic conditions, including cancer. Compelling data suggest that inhibition of angiogenesis not only prevents tumor-associated neovascularization, but also affects tumor growth and spread. Neuroblastoma growth appears to be angiogenesis-dependent and is, therefore, likely to be susceptible to antiangiogenic therapy. Studies in animals have demonstrated that neuroblastoma is susceptible to a variety of angiogenesis inhibitors, including TNP-470 (a fumagillin derivative),57, 58, 59 vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-Trap,60 a truncated soluble form of the VEGF receptor-2,61, 62 and pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF).63 In addition, standard chemotherapeutic agents, when given using a low continuous dosing schedule, appear capable of treating tumors that had been previously resistant to them by destroying the neovascularity required by a progressing tumor.64 By avoiding a “maximal tolerated dose” scheduling of these drugs, the patient can forego the recovery time required between cycles, thereby preventing recovery of the chemotherapy-sensitive endothelial cells. VEGF Trap was tested in a recent COG phase I clinical trial for children with refractory solid tumors.

New targets 
ALK inhibition 

Recently, activating mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) oncogene on the short arm of chromosome 2 (2p23) were identified as germ line mutations associated with hereditary neuroblastoma.65 These mutations can also be somatically acquired, although the prevalence of ALK activation in sporadic neuroblastoma remains to be determined. Constitutive activation of the ALK receptor tyrosine kinase by mutation or translocation appears to contribute to the malignant phenotype of several cancers, including neuroblastoma, making it a potentially therapeutic target. This hypothesis is supported by the recent finding of ALK as a molecular target by a screen of neuroblastoma cell lines with pharmacologic antagonists.66 The orally bioavailable small molecule inhibitor of ALK, PF-02341066, is currently being tested in a COG phase I/II trial of relapsed/refractory solid tumors.

Aurora A kinase inhibition 

Aurora A kinase is serine/threonine kinase that is expressed in all actively dividing cells and is critical for cell-cycle progression.67 It is also overexpressed in numerous types of tumors, including neuroblastoma, in which it likely serves as an oncogene.68 Because of its central role in mitosis, inhibition of aurora A kinase may be broadly effective as an anticancer approach. Recently, MLN8237, a selective, reversible small molecule inhibitor of aurora A kinase showed in vivo activity against a panel of neuroblastoma xenografts that far exceeded that observed for standard agents evaluated against the panel.69 On the basis of this activity, a phase II clinical trial has been initiated in the COG using this agent to treat a variety of recurrent/refractory tumors, including neuroblastoma.

TRK inhibition 

Neurotrophins and their tyrosine kinase receptors are important in the development of the sympathetic nervous system and have been implicated in the pathogenesis of neuroblastoma. Three receptor-ligand pairs have been identified: TrkA, the primary receptor for nerve growth factor (NGF); TrkB, the primary receptor of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF); and TrkC, the receptor for neurotrophin-3 (NT-3).70 TrkA appears to mediate differentiation of developing neurons or neuroblastoma in the presence of NGF ligand, and apoptosis in the absence of NGF.71 High TrkA expression is associated with favorable tumor biology and good outcome72 and is inversely correlated with MYCN amplification.73 Conversely, the TrkB/BDNF pathway appears to promote neuroblastoma survival through autocrine or paracrine signaling, especially in MYCN-amplified tumors.74 TrkB is expressed in approximately 40% of neuroblastomas, usually advanced-stage disease. TrkC is expressed in approximately 25% of neuroblastomas and is strongly associated with TrkA expression.75 Although the exact function of the Trk receptors in the pathogenesis of neuroblastoma is unknown, they remain attractive therapeutic targets. Studies are ongoing to test agonists of TrkA in an attempt to induce cellular differentiation. Conversely, blocking the BDNF/TrkB signaling pathway with Trk-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as CEP-751, may induce apoptosis by blocking crucial survival pathways.74, 76, 77, 78

Tubulin-binding agents 

Microtubules play a critical role in the migration of replicated chromosomes during cell division. Tubulin-binding agents can inhibit this process, thereby blocking the cell cycle in the G2/M phase, ultimately resulting in the induction of apoptosis.79 ABT-751 is an orally bioavailable antimitotic agent that binds β-tubulin and inhibits polymerization of microtubules.80 Preclinical studies of this agent found it to be most effective in neuroblastoma models and a phase I study showed it to be safe.81, 82 The results of a recently concluded phase II trial of ABT-751 in children with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma are pending publication.

Epigenetic targeting 

The hallmark of cancer is dysregulated gene expression. However, not only do genetic factors influence gene expression but epigenetic factors do as well, with these factors being at least as important as genetic changes in their contribution to the pathogenesis of cancer. Epigenetic alterations are defined as those heritable changes in gene expression that do not result from direct changes in DNA sequence. Mechanisms of epigenetic regulation most commonly include DNA methylation, modification of histones, and changes in microRNA (miRNA) expression.

DNA methylation 

DNA methylation is a reversible process that involves methylation of the fifth position of cytosine within CpG dinucleotides present in DNA. These dinucleotides are usually in the promoter regions of genes; methylation of these sites typically causes gene silencing, thereby preventing expression of the encoded proteins. This process is part of the normal mechanism for imprinting, X-chromosome inactivation and generally keeping large areas of genomic DNA silent, but may also contribute to the pathogenesis of cancer by silencing tumor suppressor genes. Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis of neuroblastic tumors revealed that hypermethylation events are extensive and contribute to the clinicopathologic features of these tumors.83 Promoter methylation resulting in silencing of caspase 8, a protein involved in apoptosis, for example, likely contributes to the pathogenesis of MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma.84 Brief exposure of caspase 8-deficient neuroblastoma cells to low levels of demethylating agents results in the reexpression of caspase 8 and the resensitization of the cells to chemotherapeutic drug-induced apoptosis. A phase I clinical trial was conducted through COG in which decitabine (5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine), an agent known to interfere with DNA methylation, was given, together with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, to children with relapsed/refractory solid tumors. Unfortunately, doses of decitabine capable of producing clinically relevant biological effects were not well tolerated with this combination.85

Histone modification 

Histones are the proteins that give structure to DNA, and together with the DNA form the major components of chromatin. Alterations in histones can mediate changes in chromatin structure. The compacted form of DNA, termed heterochromatin, is largely inaccessible to transcription factors and, therefore, genes in the affected regions are silent. Other modifications of histones can cause DNA to take a more open or extended configuration (euchromatin), allowing for gene transcription. Histones can be modified by several different processes, including methylation and acetylation, mediated by histone acetyl transferases and deacetylases, and histone methyltransferases. Each of these processes alters histone function, which, in turn alters the structure of chromatin and, therefore, the accessibility of DNA to transcription factors. Vorinistat (SAHA) is a histone deacetylase inhibitor that impairs the ability of HDACs to repress gene transcription, thereby effecting cell cycle arrest and/or apoptosis. This drug has been tested, in combination with bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, in a recent phase I COG trial. A recent preclinical study suggests that vorinistat can also function as a radiosensitizer in neuroblastoma.86

MiRNA 

miRNAs are a group of small, noncoding RNAs that appear to function in gene regulation. These miRNAs are single–stranded RNA fragments of 21-23 nucleotides that are complementary to encoding mRNAs.87 Their function is to downregulate expression of target mRNAs; it is estimated that miRNAs regulate the expression of about 30% of all human genes.88 miRNAs are involved in several fundamental biological processes, including development, differentiation, cell-cycle regulation, and senescence. However, broad analyses of miRNA expression levels has demonstrated that many miRNAs are dysregulated in a variety of different cancer types, including neuroblastoma and other pediatric tumors,89 frequently losing their function as gene silencers/tumor suppressors. The activity of miRNAs, like gene expression, is also under epigenetic regulation. Therapeutic targeting of miRNA in neuroblastoma is currently being explored.90

Other recent molecular advances 

Recently, microarray technologies have generated extensive amounts of data that have aided in identifying genomic (DNA) and transcriptomic (RNA) abnormalities associated with neuroblastoma. In addition, these abnormalities have been shown to have significant predictive power when anticipating outcome for these patients.91, 92 Many of these findings were generated by large scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS). This is a technique whereby all or most of the genes of patients with neuroblastoma are analyzed to find differences with the population as a whole, looking for variations that are associated with the development and aggressiveness of neuroblastoma.

One such type of variation is a single-nucleotide polymorphism in which there is a variation in the DNA sequence for a single nucleotide between children with neuroblastoma and those without, and with varying degrees of tumor phenotype. Another type of variation is copy-number variation (CNV) which is an alteration of the DNA resulting in an abnormal number of copies of one or more sections of the DNA. CNVs correspond to relatively large regions of the genome that have been deleted or duplicated.

Copy number variations 

One method for detecting CNVs is by comparative genomic hybridization. Early comparative genomic hybridization studies showed that gain of genetic material on the long arm of chromosome 17 (17q) is perhaps the most common genetic abnormality in neuroblastomas, occurring in approximately 75% of primary tumors.93 It is unclear, however, at this time, how extra copies of 17q contribute to the malignant phenotype of neuroblastoma and which gene(s) on 17q are the critical ones. Candidate genes include survivin and PPM1D.94, 95 Nevertheless, gain of chromosome 17q is strongly associated with other known prognostic factors, but it may also be a powerful predictor of adverse outcome.96 More recently, GWAS studies have shown that inherited copy number variation at chromosome 1q21.1 is associated with neuroblastoma, implicating a neuroblastoma breakpoint family gene in early neuroblastoma genesis.97

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms 

Other molecular studies have revealed that common genetic variation at chromosome bands 6p2298 and 2q3599 are associated with susceptibility to, and likely contribute to the etiology of, high-risk neuroblastoma, providing the first evidence that childhood cancers also arise owing to complex interactions of polymorphic variants. More recently a GWAS study has identified common polymorphisms, including germ line single nucleotide polymorphism risk alleles and somatic copy number gain, resulting in increased expression of the cysteine-rich transcriptional regulator LIM domain only 1 (LMO1) at 11p15.4. These have been shown to be strongly associated with susceptibility to developing neuroblastoma, and often are associated with advanced disease and poor survival.100

Mutations 

Linkage studies showed an association of 2p23-p24 abnormalities in patients with familial neuroblastoma which eventually led to the identification of ALK mutations on 2p23.1 inherited as the germ line abnormality associated with familial neuroblastoma. Further studies have identified loss of function mutations in the homeobox gene PHOXB2 on 4p13 that are also associated with familial neuroblastoma, particularly when occurring together with Hirschsprung's disease and/or central hypoventilation.101

Efflux proteins 

Multidrug transporter genes encode proteins that serve as drug efflux pumps whose expression in neuroblastoma appears to be correlated with MYCN amplification and poor prognosis.102, 103 The presence of these multidrug resistance genes that encode the ATP-binding cassette superfamily may explain why neuroblastomas initially respond well to chemotherapy but subsequently become resistant. Recent data suggest that ATP-binding cassette transporters may also modulate neuroblastoma behavior independent of their effect on chemotherapy efflux.104

Conclusions 

As more information regarding diagnostically and prognostically useful genetic markers of neuroblastoma become available, therapeutic strategies will change accordingly. In addition, molecular profiling will lead to new drug development designed to induce differentiation of tumor cells, block dysregulated growth pathways, or reactivate silenced apoptotic pathways. One of the most exciting prospects for improving the therapeutic index, as well as overcoming the problem of tumor resistance to therapy, involves targeted therapy. These new agents can be used in concert with traditional regimens; some may be used independently.

Many of these complex studies are being conducted among collaborating and cooperating groups. Genetic analyses are being performed through the Therapeutically Applicable Research to Generate Effective Treatments (TARGET) program in the National Cancer Institute. Preclinical studies are being performed to test new drugs and drug combinations at high throughput against neuroblastoma cells in vitro and xenografts in vivo in the Pediatric Preclinical Testing Program (PPTP). Finally, large clinical trials continue to be conducted by the COG. In addition, several universities and children's hospitals have formed a consortium funded by the National Cancer Institute to test promising new therapies for neuroblastoma. The New Approaches to Neuroblastoma Therapy (NANT) consortium was formed to organize closely collaborating investigators whose laboratory programs are developing novel therapies for high-risk neuroblastoma. Those with promising results will be considered for more extensive national testing. Finally, results from clinical trials worldwide can now be compared by the use of standard INRG risk stratification factors.

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Brodeur GM , Castleberry RP . Neuroblastoma . In:  Pizzo PA ,  Poplack DG editor. Principles and Practice of Pediatric Oncology . 2nd edn. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott; 1993;p. 739–767
  2. Young JL , Ries LG , Silverberg E , et al.  Cancer incidence, survival, and mortality for children younger than age 15 years . Cancer . 1986;58:598–602
  3. Brodeur GM , Nakagawara A . Molecular basis of clinical heterogeneity in neuroblastoma . Am J Pediatr Hematol/Oncol . 1992;14:111–116
  4. Breslow N , McCann B . Statistical estimation of prognosis for children with neuroblastoma . Cancer Res . 1971;31:2098–2103
  5. Evans AE , D'Angio GJ , Propert K , et al.  Prognostic factor in neuroblastoma . Cancer . 1987;59:1853–1859
  6. Brodeur GM , Seeger RC , Schwab M , et al.  Amplification of N-myc in untreated human neuroblastomas correlates with advanced disease stage . Science . 1984;224:1121–1124
  7. Seeger RC , Brodeur GM , Sather H , et al.  Association of multiple copies of the N-myc oncogene with rapid progression of neuroblastomas . N Engl J Med . 1985;313:1111–1116
  8. Shimada H , Umehara S , Monobe Y , et al.  International neuroblastoma pathology classification for prognostic evaluation of patients with peripheral neuroblastic tumors: A report from the children's Cancer Group . Cancer . 2001;92:2451–2461
  9. Look AT , Hayes FA , Shuster JJ , et al.  Clinical relevance of tumor cell ploidy and N-myc gene amplification in childhood neuroblastoma: A Pediatric Oncology Group study . J Clin Oncol . 1991;9:581–591
  10. Look AT , Hayes FA , Nitschke R , et al.  Cellular DNA content as a predictor of response to chemotherapy in infants with unresectable neuroblastoma . N Engl J Med . 1984;311:231–235
  11. Brodeur GM , Pritchard J , Berthold F , et al.  Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment . J Clin Oncol . 1993;11:1466–1477
  12. Monclair T , Brodeur GM , Ambros PF , et al.  The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) staging system: An INRG Task Force report . J Clin Oncol . 2009;27:298–303
  13. Cecchetto G , Mosseri V , De Bernardi B , et al.  Surgical risk factors in primary surgery for localized neuroblastoma: The LNESG1 study of the European International Society of Pediatric Oncology Neuroblastoma Group . J Clin Oncol . 2005;23:8483–8489
  14. Moroz V , Machin D , Faldum A , et al.  Changes over three decades in outcome and the prognostic influence of age-at-diagnosis in young patients with neuroblastoma: A report from the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group Project . Eur J Cancer . 2011;47:561–571
  15. Shimada H , Chatten J , Newton WA , et al.  Histopathologic prognostic factors in neuroblastic tumors: Definition of subtypes of ganglioneuroblastoma and an age-linked classification of neuroblastomas . J Natl Cancer Inst . 1984;73:405–416
  16. Shimada H , Ambros IM , Dehner LP , et al.  Terminology and morphologic criteria of neuroblastic tumors: Recommendations by the International Neuroblastoma Pathology Committee . Cancer . 1999;86:349–363
  17. Peuchmaur M , d'Amore ES , Joshi VV , et al.  Revision of the International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification: Confirmation of favorable and unfavorable prognostic subsets in ganglioneuroblastoma, nodular . Cancer . 2003;98:2274–2281
  18. Chatten J , Shimada H , Sather HN , et al.  Prognostic value of histopathology in advanced neuroblastoma: A report from the Children's Cancer Study Group . Hum Pathol . 1988;19:1187–1198
  19. De Bernardi B , Gambini C , Haupt R , et al.  Retrospective study of childhood ganglioneuroma . J Clin Oncol . 2008;26:1710–1716
  20. Schwab M , Alitalo K , Klempnauer KH , et al.  Amplified DNA with limited homology to myc cellular oncogene is shared by human neuroblastoma cell lines and a neuroblastoma tumour . Nature . 1983;305:245–248
  21. Kaneko Y , Kanda N , Maseki N , et al.  Different karyotypic patterns in early and advanced stage neuroblastomas . Cancer Res . 1987;47:311–318
  22. Bowman LC , Castleberry RP , Cantor A , et al.  Genetic staging of unresectable or metastatic neuroblastoma in infants: A Pediatric Oncology Group study . J Natl Cancer Inst . 1997;89:373–380
  23. Brodeur GM , Sekhon G , Goldstein MN . Chromosomal aberrations in human neuroblastomas . Cancer . 1977;40:2256–2263
  24. Fong CT , Dracopoli NC , White PS , et al.  Loss of heterozygosity for the short arm of chromosome 1 in human neuroblastomas: Correlation with N-myc amplification . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 1989;86:3753–3757
  25. Gilbert F , Feder M , Balaban G , et al.  Human neuroblastomas and abnormalities of chromosomes 1 and 17 . Cancer Res . 1984;44:5444–5449
  26. Attiyeh EF , London WB , Mossé YP , et al.  Chromosome 1p and 11q deletions and outcome in neuroblastoma . N Engl J Med . 2005;353:2243–2253
  27. Fujita T , Igarashi J , Okawa ER , et al.  CHD5, a tumor suppressor gene deleted from 1p36.31 in neuroblastomas . J Natl Cancer Inst . 2008;100:940–949
  28. Takayama H , Suzuki T , Mugishima H , et al.  Deletion mapping of chromosomes 14q and 1p in human neuroblastoma . Oncogene . 1992;7:1185–1189
  29. Baker DL , Schmidt ML , Cohn SL , et al.  Outcome after reduced chemotherapy for intermediate-risk neuroblastoma . N Engl J Med . 2010;363:1313–1323
  30. Matthay KK , Villablanca JG , Seeger RC , et al.  Treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma with intensive chemotherapy, radiotherapy, autologous bone marrow transplantation, and 13-cis-retinoic acid (Children's Cancer Group) . N Engl J Med . 1999;341:1165–1173
  31. Rill DR , Santana VM , Roberts WM , et al.  Direct demonstration that autologous bone marrow transplantation for solid tumors can return a multiplicity of tumorigenic cells . Blood . 1994;84:380–383
  32. Garaventa A , Ladenstein R , Chauvin F , et al.  High-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow rescue in advanced stage IV neuroblastoma . Eur J Cancer . 1993;29A:487–491
  33. La Quaglia MP , Kushner BH , Su W , et al.  The impact of gross total resection on local control and survival in high-risk neuroblastoma . J Pediatr Surg . 2004;39:412–417
  34. Moon SB , Park KW , Jung SE , et al.  Neuroblastoma: Treatment outcome after incomplete resection of primary tumors . Pediatr Surg Int . 2009;25:789–793
  35. Castel V , Tovar JA , Costa E , et al.  The role of surgery in stage IV neuroblastoma . J Pediatr Surg . 2002;37:1574–1578
  36. Kiely EM . The surgical challenge of neuroblastoma . J Pediatr Surg . 1994;29:128–133
  37. Azizkhan RG , Haase GM . Current biologic and therapeutic implications in the surgery of neuroblastoma . Semin Surg Oncol . 1993;9:493–501
  38. Medary I , Aronson D , Cheung NK , et al.  Kinetics of primary tumor regression with chemotherapy: Implications for the timing of surgery . Ann Surg Oncol . 1996;3:521–525
  39. Davidoff AM , Corey BL , Hoffer FA , et al.  Radiographic assessment of resectability of locoregional disease in children with high-risk neuroblastoma during neoadjuvant chemotherapy . Rediatr Blood Cancer . 2005;44:158–162
  40. Cohn SL , Pearson AD , London WB , et al.  The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) classification system: An INRG Task Force report . J Clin Oncol . 2009;27:289–297
  41. Cheung NK . Immunotherapy (Neuroblastoma as a model) . Pediatr Clin North Am . 1991;38:425–441
  42. Cheung NK , Burch L , Kushner BH , et al.  Monoclonal antibody 3F8 can effect durable remissions in neuroblastoma patients refractory to chemotherapy; a phase II trial . In:  Evans AE ,  D'Angio GJ ,  Kundson AG , et al. editor. Advances in Neuroblastoma Research, vol 3 . New York: Wiley-Liss; 1991;p. 395
  43. Ozkaynak MF , Sondel PM , Krailo MD , et al.  Phase I study of chimeric human/murine anti-ganglioside G(D2) monoclonal antibody (Ch 14.18 with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in children with neuroblastoma immediately after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation: a Children's Cancer Group Study . J Clin Oncol . 2000;18:4077–4085
  44. Hank JA , Surfus J , Gan J , et al.  Treatment of neuroblastoma patients with antiganglioside GD2 antibody plus interleukin-2 induces antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity against neuroblastoma detected in vitro . J Immunother . 1994;15:29–37
  45. Yu AL , Gilman AL , Ozkaynak MF , et al.  Anti-GD2 antibody with GM-CSF, interleukin-2, and isotretinoin for neuroblastoma . N Engl J Med . 2010;363:1324–1334
  46. Gelfand MJ . Meta-iodobenzylguanidine in children . Semin Nucl Med . 1993;23:231–242
  47. Lashford LS , Lewis IJ , Fielding SL , et al.  Phase I/II study of iodine 131 metaiodobenzylguanidine in chemoresistant neuroblastoma: A United Kingdom children's Cancer Study Group investigation . J Clin Oncol . 1992;10:1889–1896
  48. Haase GM , Meagher DP , McNeely LK , et al.  Electron beam intraoperative radiation therapy for pediatric neoplasms . Cancer . 1994;74:740–747
  49. Hoefnagel CA , Smets L , Voûte PA , de Kraku J . Iodine-125-MIBG therapy for neuroblastoma . J Nucl Med . 1991;32:361–362
  50. Polishchuk AL , DuBois SG , Haas-Kogan DA , et al.  Response, survival, and toxicity after iodine-131-metaiodobenzylguanidine therapy for neuroblastoma in preadolescents, adolescents, and adults . Cancer . 2011;117:4286–4293
  51. Reynolds CP , Kane DJ , Einhorn PA , et al.  Response of neuroblastoma to retinoic acid in vitro and in vivo . Prog Clin Biol Res . 1991;366:203–211
  52. Reynolds CP , Schindler P , Jones D , et al.  Comparisons of 13-cisretinoic acid to trans-retronic acid using human neuroblastoma cell lines . In:  Evans AE ,  Biedler JL ,  Brodeur G , et al. editor. Advances in Neuroblastoma Research, vol 4 . New York: Wiley; 1994;p. 237–244
  53. Sidell N , Altman A , Haussler MR , Seeger RC . Effects of retinoic acid (RA) on the growth and phenotypic expression of several human neuroblastoma cell lines . Exp Cell Res . 1983;148:21–30
  54. Thiele CJ , Reynolds CP , Israel MA . Decreased expression of N-myc precedes retinoic acid-induced morphological differentiation of human neuroblastoma . Nature . 1985;313:404–406
  55. Di Vinci A , Geido E , Infusini E , Giaretti W . Neuroblastoma cell apoptosis induced by the synthetic retinoid N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide . Int J Cancer . 1994;59:422–426
  56. Villablanca JG , Krailo MD , Ames MM , et al.  Phase I Trial of Oral Fenretinide in Children With High-Risk Solid Tumors: A Report From the Children's Oncolgy Group (CCG:09709) . J Clin Oncol . 2006;24:3423–3430
  57. Nagabuchi E , VanderKolk WE , Une Y , et al.  TNP-470 antiangiogenic therapy for advanced murine neuroblastoma . J Pediatr Surg . 1997;32:287–293
  58. Wassberg E , Påhlman S , Westlin JE , et al.  The angiogenesis inhibitor TNP-470 reduces the growth rate of human neuroblastoma in nude rats . Pediatr Res . 1997;41:327–333
  59. Shusterman S , Grupp SA , Barr R , et al.  The angiogenesis inhibitor TNP-470 Effectively Inhibits Human Neuroblastoma xenograft Growth, Especially in the Setting of Subclinical Disease . Clin Cancer Res . 2001;7:977–984
  60. Kim ES , Serur A , Huang J , et al.  Potent VEGF blockade causes regression of coopted vessels in a model of neuroblastoma . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 2002;99:11399–11404
  61. Davidoff AM , Leary MA , Ng CY , et al.  Gene therapy-mediated expression by tumor cells of the angiogenesis inhibitor flk-1 results in inhibition of neuroblastoma growth in vivo . J Pediatr Surg . 2001;36:30–36
  62. Davidoff AM , Leary MA , Ng CY , et al.  Retroviral vector-producer cell mediated angiogenesis inhibition restricts neuroblastoma growth in vivo . Med Pediatr Oncol . 2000;35:638–640
  63. Crawford SE , Stellmach V , Ranalli M , et al.  Pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) in neuroblastoma: A multifunctional mediator of Schwann cell antitumor activity . J Cell Sci . 2001;114:4421–4428
  64. Browder T , Butterfield CE , Kräling BM , et al.  Antiangiogenic scheduling of chemotherapy improves efficacy against experimental drug-resistant cancer . Cancer Res . 2000;60:1878–1886
  65. Mossé YP , Laudenslager M , Longo L , et al.   Identification of ALK as a major familial neuroblastoma predisposition gene . Nature . 2008;455:930–935
  66. Mossé YP , Wood A , Maris JM . Inhibition of ALK signaling for cancer therapy . Clin Cancer Res . 2009;15:5609–5614
  67. Hirota T , Kunitoku N , Sasayama T , et al.  Aurora-A and an interacting activator, the LIM protein Ajuba, are required for mitotic commitment in human cells . Cell . 2003;114:585–598
  68. Shang X , Burlingame SM , Okcu MF , et al.  Aurora A is a negative prognostic factor and a new therapeutic target in human neuroblastoma . Mol Cancer Ther . 2009;8:2461–2469
  69. Maris JM , Morton CL , Gorlick R , et al.  Initial testing of the aurora kinase A inhibitor MLN8237 by the Pediatric Preclinical Testing Program (PPTP) . Pediatr Blood Cancer . 2010;55:26–34
  70. Barbacid M . Neurotrophic factors and their receptors . Curr Opin Cell Biol . 1995;7:148–155
  71. Levi-Montalcini R . The nerve growth factor 35 years later . Science . 1987;237:1154–1162
  72. Nakagawara A , Arima-Nakagawara M , Scavarda NJ , et al.  Association between high levels of expression of the TRK gene and favorable outcome in human neuroblastoma . N Engl J Med . 1993;328:847–854
  73. Nakagawara A , Arima M , Azar CG , et al.  Inverse relationship between trk expression and N-myc amplification in human neuroblastomas . Cancer Res . 1992;52:1364–1368
  74. Nakagawara A , Azar CG , Scavarda NJ , et al.  Expression and function of TRK-B and BDNF in human neuroblastomas . Mol Cell Biol . 1994;14:759–767
  75. Svensson T , Rydén M , Schilling FH , et al.  Coexpression of mRNA for the full-length neurotrophin receptor trk-C and trk-A in favourable neuroblastoma . Eur J Cancer . 1997;33:2058–2063
  76. Evans AE , Kisselbach KD , Yamashiro DJ , et al.  Antitumor activity of CEP-751 (KT-6587) on human neuroblastoma and medulloblastoma xenografts . Clin Cancer Res . 1999;5:3594–3602
  77. Acheson A , Conover JC , Fandl JP , et al.  A BDNF autocrine loop in adult sensory neurons prevents cell death . Nature . 1995;374:450–453
  78. Matsumoto K , Wada RK , Yamashiro JM , et al.  Expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and p145TrkB affects survival, differentiation, and invasiveness of human neuroblastoma cells . Cancer Res . 1995;55:1798–1806
  79. Downing KH , Nogales E . Tubulin structure: Insights into microtubule properties and functions . Curr Opin Struct Biol . 1998;8:785–791
  80. Galmarini CM . ABT-751 (Abbott) . Curr Opin Investig Drugs . 2005;6:623–630
  81. Morton CL , Favours EG , Mercer KS , et al.  Evaluation of ABT-751 against childhood cancer models in vivo . Invest New Drugs . 2007;25:285–295
  82. Fox E , Maris JM , Widemann BC , et al.  A phase I study of ABT-751, an orally bioavailable tubulin inhibitor, administered daily for 21 days every 28 days in pediatric patients with solid tumors . Clin Cancer Res . 2008;14:1111–1115
  83. Buckley PG , Das S , Bryan K , et al.  Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis of neuroblastic tumors reveals clinically relevant epigenetic events and large-scale epigenomic alterations localized to telomeric regions . Int J Cancer . 2011;128:2296–2305
  84. Teitz T , Wei T , Valentine MB , et al.  Caspase 8 is deleted or silenced preferentially in childhood neuroblastomas with amplification of MYCN . Nat Med . 2000;6:529–535
  85. George RE , Lahti JM , Adamson PC , et al.  Phase I study of decitabine with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in children with neuroblastoma and other solid tumors: A children's Oncology Group study . Pediatr Blood Cancer . 2010;55:629–638
  86. Mueller S , Yang X , Sottero TL , et al.  Cooperation of the HDAC inhibitor vorinostat and radiation in metastatic neuroblastoma: Efficacy and underlying mechanisms . Cancer Lett . 2011;306:223–229
  87. Ruvkun G . Molecular biologyGlimpses of a tiny RNA world . Science . 2001;294:797–799
  88. Lewis BP , Burge CB , Bartel DP . Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets . Cell . 2005;120:15–20
  89. Wei JS , Johansson P , Chen QR , et al.  microRNA profiling identifies cancer-specific and prognostic signatures in pediatric malignancies . Clin Cancer Res . 2009;15:5560–5568
  90. Stallings RL , Foley NH , Bryan K , et al.  Therapeutic targeting of miRNAs in neuroblastoma . Exp Op Ther Targets . 2010;14:951–962
  91. Oberthuer A , Berthold F , Warnat P , et al.  Customized oligonucleotide microarray gene expression-based classification of neuroblastoma patients outperforms current clinical risk stratification . J Clin Oncol . 2006;24:5070–5078
  92. Janoueix-Lerosey I , Schleiermacher G , Michels E , et al.  Overall genomic pattern is a predictor of outcome in neuroblastoma . J Clin Oncol . 2009;27:1026–1033
  93. Vandesompele J , Van Roy N , Van Gele M , et al.  Genetic heterogeneity of neuroblastoma studied by comparative genomic hybridization . Genes Chromosomes Cancer . 1998;23:141–152
  94. Islam A , Kageyama H , Takada N , et al.  High expression of survivin, mapped to 17q25, is significantly associated with poor prognostic factors and promotes cell survival in human neuroblastoma . Oncogene . 2000;19:617–623
  95. Saito-Ohara F , Imoto I , Inoue J , et al.  PPM1D is a potential target for 17q gain in neuroblastoma . Cancer Res . 2003;63:1876–1883
  96. Bown N , Cotterill S , Lastowska M , et al.  Gain of chromosome arm 17q and adverse outcome in patients with neuroblastoma . N Engl J Med . 1999;340:1954–1961
  97. Diskin SJ , Hou C , Glessner JT , et al.  Copy number variation at 1q21.1 associated with neuroblastoma . Nature . 2009;459:987–991
  98. Maris JM , Mosse YP , Bradfield JP , et al.  Chromosome 6p22 locus associated with clinically aggressive neuroblastoma . N Engl J Med . 2008;358:2585–2593
  99. Capasso M , Devoto M , Hou C , et al.  Common variations in BARD1 influence susceptibility to high-risk neuroblastoma . Nat Genet . 2009;41:718–723
  100. Wang K , Diskin SJ , Zhang H , et al.  Integrative genomics identifies LMO1 as a neuroblastoma oncogene . Nature . 2011;469:216–220
  101. Mosse YP , Laudenslager M , Khazi D , et al.  Germline PHOX2B mutation in hereditary neuroblastoma . Am J Hum Genet . 2004;75:727–730
  102. Bradshaw DM , Arceci RJ . Clinical relevance of transmembrane drug efflux as a mechanism of multidrug resistance . J Clin Oncol . 1998;16:3674–3690
  103. Norris MD , Bordow SB , Marshall GM , et al.  Expression of the gene for multidrug-resistance-associated protein and outcome in patients with neuroblastoma . N Engl J Med . 1996;334:231–238
  104. Henderson MJ , Haber M , Porro A , et al.  ABCC multidrug Transporters in Childhood Neuroblastoma: Clinical and Biological Effects Independent of cytotoxic Drug Efflux . J Natl Cancer Inst . 2011;103:1236–1251

PII: S1055-8586(11)00096-5

doi:10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2011.10.009

Seminars in Pediatric Surgery
Volume 21, Issue 1 , Pages 2-14, February 2012

Article Tools